Empty The Bench
- The Season's Over -

Conference Finals Trends to Watch for in the NBA Finals (or Why I Was Wrong)

June 1, 2009

Los Angeles Lakers Pau Gasol

Pau Gasol Photo Credit: Icon SMI

By: Zachariah Blott

I wrote a column about 3 weeks ago detailing my reasons why only Cleveland or Denver had a chance of winning the NBA Championship this year. Obviously, I was wrong. Unlike a majority of our politicians, however, I will freely point out when my predictions turn out to be turds and even use the evidence that made me look stupid to (hopefully) formulate better predictions in the future.

Here are a few patterns that emerged during the Conference Finals to also keep in mind during these NBA Finals between the Lakers and Magic.

1) Pau Gasol has entered the strata of Dwight Howard, Tim Duncan, and Dirk Nowitzki (apologies to the injured Kevin Garnett); these are big men who can singlehandedly neutralize an opponent’s entire front line on a consistent basis. The Nuggets came into the series with a dominant group of forwards and centers who controlled the paint for most of the regular season and the first two rounds of the playoffs. If it wasn’t Carmelo scoring or Nene doing a little of everything, then it was Kenyon Martin and Chris Andersen playing stellar defense and getting into the heads of the other team.

Gasol took on this meat grinder of a frontline just about by himself. Andrew Bynum is obviously nowhere near 100% and Lamar Odom had two games worth mentioning.

What did Gasol do in this situation?

He posted a double-double in all six games with averages of 18 points and 12 rebounds. He blocked 14 shots in the series, only one less than Andersen, who was second in the league with 2.5 during the regular season. Gasol also hit 63% of his shots against this physically punishing group of bigs. My hat is off to #16; I didn’t anticipate this type of performance against Denver in the paint. His statistical output will likely take a hit when playing against Howard, but his play will be instrumental.

2) Kobe Bryant made some wise real-estate purchases recently, namely in the Free Throw Line parts of town. Against a solid defensive Denver team, Bryant shot about as well as he did during the season (48% vs. 47% in the season), hit triples at about the same rate (34% vs. 35% in the season), but was able to take almost twice as many free throws each contest.

During the regular season, Bryant attempted 6.9 foul shots per contest, but he got to the line 72 times against the Nuggets (12.0 per), converting a phenomenal 67 of them (93%). If Kobe can live at the line against a defense like Denver, than maybe he can have similar luck against Orlando.

Two more Conference Finals trends to remember after the break…

3) Orlando will hit their triples against small backcourts. As I pointed out in a previous post, the Magic’s top three deep threats are huge: Rashard Lewis (6-10), Hedo Turkoglu (6-10), and Mickael Pietrus (6-6). Against Philly and Boston, who each have a few 6-5 to 6-8 perimeter defenders, Orlando was spotty from behind the arc – some good games, some bad.

Against Cleveland’s Smurfy backcourt and Wally Szczerbiak (who plays defense about as well as you’d expect from a player with lateral quickness issues), the Magic shot over 35% in five of their six games, including over 40% in four. LeBron’s much improved D could only cover so many shooters. Bryant (6-6) and Trevor Ariza (6-8) better be up to the task, or it could be raining all over Disneyland and Disney World.

4) Orlando’s defense goes against conventional wisdom that states you stop a team by stopping its star. Instead, the Magic watched LeBron light up the scoreboard to the tune of 49, 35, 41, 44, 37, and 25 points, respectively. For every other Cavalier, though, it was lights out. Mo Williams and Delonte West were simply pedestrian shooters for most of the series with their defenders sticking around and not leaving to double-team James. Look for Orlando to employ a similar strategy versus Los Angeles’ Bryant, with the goal of containing Gasol and Odom and not letting them explode at any point in the series.

Zachariah Blott is an English teacher in Portland, not an Amish Charles Dickens character.

Related Reading:
- Why the Denver Nuggets and Cleveland Cavaliers are the Only Real Title Contenders
- An Official Apology to the Orlando Magic
- Welcome to the Conference Finals, Lamar
- Still Think Rashard Lewis is Overpaid?

Possibly Related Content:

  1. Three Early Observations from the 2009 NBA Conference Championships

  2. College is for Chumps in the 2009 NBA Finals

  3. Game, Set, Match for the Lakers? Random Thoughts from Game 4 of the NBA Finals

  4. ETB’s 2009 NBA Finals Preview & Predictions

  5. Let’s Not Bury the Orlando Magic Just Yet

10 Comments »Posted by ETB Contributor on Jun. 1, 2009 at 2:12 am in NBA

10 Responses

My hat is off to you Blott, you actually admitted you were wrong for once.

Posted by: r.i.p_petrovic on June 2nd, 2009 at 12:44 am

And here I thought you accused ME of being unfairly harsh toward one person.

Speaking of which, whose career-high FG% for a season from this list is below every other player’s career average? (Here’s a hint: he also averaged the least amount of assists of the group and has the worst A-TO rate. Another hint: despite having less efficient shooting and passing #’s than everyone else on this list, he’s often called the best offensive player of all-time.)

Chris Paul
Clyde Drexler
Dwayne Wade
Jerry West
John Stockton
Kobe Bryant
Lebron James
Michael Jordan
Steve Nash
Tony Parker

Posted by: Zachariah Blott on June 3rd, 2009 at 1:02 pm

That is completely beside the point I was trying to make. When in your previous article you requested that someone show you a stat where Bryant’s team had a winning record without Gasol/Shaq, and I provided one, you put your foot in your mouth and had nothing to say for yourself; no apology there, was there? Similar to how you continue to number crunch and spit out statistics, and forget the important stuff like which players play for which teams (Cuttino Mobley??). Break out the HAT-O-RADE Blott, with the exception of West/Jordan/Parker, Bryant has more rings than all of them on that list put together, which as you will hear every NBA player say, is all that matters.

Posted by: r.i.p_petrovic on June 3rd, 2009 at 8:59 pm

You were right; the Lakers were 0-2 in 05-06 without Kobe. You got me.

Everyone on that Lakers team with Shaq has 3 rings: good for Shaq and all those fortunate enough to be on his team.

Posted by: Zachariah Blott on June 4th, 2009 at 12:19 am

Every time you have an article on the Lakers, you take the opportunity to take little stabs at Bryant – I am referring to the article you wrote on Pau Gasol’s recent dominance – “he (Pau) has a trigger happy shooting guard in Bryant”. Stick to your day job Blott and stop littering the internet with these subtle attacks on Bryant. You had your chance to voice your opinions on him in your first article, why do you keep trying to get your point across, who are you trying to convince?

Posted by: r.i.p_petrovic on June 4th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

Is Bryant trigger happy or not? Isn’t it good for a team to have a great offensive rebounder if they also have a shooting guard who shoots 25-30 times a game with a so-so shooting percentage? Are the Lakers much better with Gasol or not?

Bryant’s efficiency as a shooter and passer has stayed rather static for several years: the team obviously rises and falls with improvements and losses in the front court.

Posted by: Zachariah Blott on June 5th, 2009 at 11:04 am

Once again, you’ve missed my point sir.

Posted by: r.i.p._petrovic on June 5th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

If your point is that I continually take stabs at Bryant by pointing out how well his teammates play in victories, then I guess we don’t disagree. Bryant shoots a lot and does not have a good FG% for a shooting guard. It’s hard for you to call this taking a stab at him; these are facts. Gasol, Odom, and Bynum as a unit are all over the place with their play, but the Lakers sure seem to have a real good winning percentage when two of them are on. This is not a stab at Bryant.

Posted by: Zachariah Blott on June 6th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Ok, perhaps I should clarify what I meant. I’m not arguing that you don’t have a point with the stats your pulling out, its the fact that you cant let the discussion on this topic go. I wasn’t the one that brought it up on this discussion board. I think there are far more interesting topics to discuss e.g. a Magic v Cavs breakdown, but maybe thats just me.

Posted by: r.i.p._petrovic on June 6th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

http://20secondtimeout.blogspot.com/2009/06/are-lakers-really-better-off-when-kobe.html

Posted by: D-Fowler on June 7th, 2009 at 11:39 am

Leave a Comment



(will not be displayed)