<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantasy Football &#8211; Week 10 Position Ranks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/</link>
	<description>The season&#039;s over.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-32707</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/#comment-32707</guid>
		<description>We aren&#039;t big fans of ESPN&#039;s fantasy stats projections. It&#039;s not that the Iggles are easier to stop, it&#039;s that the Giants have a more proven track record of recording sacks and turnovers, so...

I don&#039;t think you can go wrong with Jacksonville though. Culpepper will be good for a few sacks and picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We aren&#8217;t big fans of ESPN&#8217;s fantasy stats projections. It&#8217;s not that the Iggles are easier to stop, it&#8217;s that the Giants have a more proven track record of recording sacks and turnovers, so&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you can go wrong with Jacksonville though. Culpepper will be good for a few sacks and picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-32700</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/#comment-32700</guid>
		<description>COOL THANKS BRIAN, BOWE JUST GOT PICKED UP...SO I THINK I&#039;LL RUN W/BERRIAN IN THAT 3RD SPOT...AND I&#039;LL KEEP AN EYE ON RICE&#039;S HEALTH..ON ESPN HE&#039;S PROJECTED LIKE 17 POINTS THIS WEEK, AND THEY&#039;RE ALSO PROJECTING GIANTS 8 AND JAGUARS 22...YOU SEE MY DILEMA..BUT BOTH THE GIANTS AND SLATON HAVE BEEN WORK HORSES FOR ME..AND YOU GUYS ALWAYS COME THROUGH SO WE&#039;LL SEE. YOU THINK EAGLES ARE EASIER TO STOP FOR GIANTS THAN LIONS ARE FOR JAGUARS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COOL THANKS BRIAN, BOWE JUST GOT PICKED UP&#8230;SO I THINK I&#8217;LL RUN W/BERRIAN IN THAT 3RD SPOT&#8230;AND I&#8217;LL KEEP AN EYE ON RICE&#8217;S HEALTH..ON ESPN HE&#8217;S PROJECTED LIKE 17 POINTS THIS WEEK, AND THEY&#8217;RE ALSO PROJECTING GIANTS 8 AND JAGUARS 22&#8230;YOU SEE MY DILEMA..BUT BOTH THE GIANTS AND SLATON HAVE BEEN WORK HORSES FOR ME..AND YOU GUYS ALWAYS COME THROUGH SO WE&#8217;LL SEE. YOU THINK EAGLES ARE EASIER TO STOP FOR GIANTS THAN LIONS ARE FOR JAGUARS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-32696</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/#comment-32696</guid>
		<description>When in doubt, my main man J, always just go by our recommendations above. If we have Bowe ahead of D-Mace, then Bowe is the guy we think you should run with.

But to quickly answer your questions:

1. NY Giants (this is a tough matchup though, but they&#039;re ranked higher than JAX based on what they&#039;ve done so far this season)

2. Johnson, Evans, Bowe

3. Jacobs and Slaton. Rice is tempting, but it looks like a possible timeshare there this week and both he and McGahee are banged up. If McGahee is declared out, however, and Rice is good to go, perhaps consider Rice instead of Slaton, who on paper has a pretty tough matchup.
2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When in doubt, my main man J, always just go by our recommendations above. If we have Bowe ahead of D-Mace, then Bowe is the guy we think you should run with.</p>
<p>But to quickly answer your questions:</p>
<p>1. NY Giants (this is a tough matchup though, but they&#8217;re ranked higher than JAX based on what they&#8217;ve done so far this season)</p>
<p>2. Johnson, Evans, Bowe</p>
<p>3. Jacobs and Slaton. Rice is tempting, but it looks like a possible timeshare there this week and both he and McGahee are banged up. If McGahee is declared out, however, and Rice is good to go, perhaps consider Rice instead of Slaton, who on paper has a pretty tough matchup.<br />
2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-32660</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/#comment-32660</guid>
		<description>One more thing....Dwayne bowe is still out there...and i&#039;ve got D.Mason on the bench should i drop him for Bowe, and start Bowe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing&#8230;.Dwayne bowe is still out there&#8230;and i&#8217;ve got D.Mason on the bench should i drop him for Bowe, and start Bowe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-32659</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/11/06/fantasy-football-week-10-position-ranks/#comment-32659</guid>
		<description>Hey guys...couple quick questions this week:
1.Jaguars or Giants...Jaguars projected higher
2.3 Wr&#039;s Berrian,A.Johnson,D.Mason,Evans,Colston
3.2 Rb&#039;s Slayton,Rice,Jacobs,Addai,Rice proj.high
I know it&#039;s a lot last minute, but if i can count on anyone it&#039;s you guys.I&#039;ve got Cutler tonight, and just dropped Prater for Dawson...good move?thanks again guys. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys&#8230;couple quick questions this week:<br />
1.Jaguars or Giants&#8230;Jaguars projected higher<br />
2.3 Wr&#8217;s Berrian,A.Johnson,D.Mason,Evans,Colston<br />
3.2 Rb&#8217;s Slayton,Rice,Jacobs,Addai,Rice proj.high<br />
I know it&#8217;s a lot last minute, but if i can count on anyone it&#8217;s you guys.I&#8217;ve got Cutler tonight, and just dropped Prater for Dawson&#8230;good move?thanks again guys. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.emptythebench.com @ 2012-02-11 18:37:51 -->
