Empty The Bench
- The Season's Over -

Is Two-Time MVP Steve Nash Overrated?

February 25, 2008

Steve Nash Lays Down

Stephen John Nash, OC, OBC Photo Credit: Icon SMI

It was an ugly performance from the new-look Phoenix Suns on Sunday, a nationally televised 30-point loss and embarrassment that has generated plenty of chatter. The home crowd was booing loudly for much of the second half, something I haven’t seen in US Airways Center for a long while. Mike D’Antoni’s squad was roundly outplayed by Detroit in all facets of the game, but most noticeable was their complete inability to stop the Pistons from scoring at will right from the tip as all five Detroit starters coasted to double-digit points. The acquisition of Shaquille O’Neal sent shockwaves through the basketball community, with most people questioning how adding an overweight, plodding, lazy, past-his-prime center would affect the Suns dynamic offense. Those concerns were all well founded, and in fact floor general Steve Nash has only tallied 8, 5 and 6 assists in the three games since Shaq came over. I still think that’s going to continue to be a problem, but it’s never been their offense I worry about too much. It’s their atrocious defense, which starts at the top.

Opposing teams are averaging 104.2 points per game against the Suns, fifth most in the NBA — only defensive stalwarts Golden State, Indiana, Memphis and Denver allow more points. This season’s numbers are actually an improvement over last season and the year before, when the Suns allowed 110.2 and 108.4 points per, the most in the league both seasons. So why is Steve Nash never called out for being one of the worst defensive point guards in the NBA?

There’s the obvious caveat here: Steve Nash is a great player. He’s unquestionably the catalyst which has transformed Phoenix’s offense into the best and most exciting in the NBA over the last four seasons. In terms of smooth passing skills, court vision, ball-handling and pure shooting Nash is the best player in the league. I’m not taking any of that away from him. The fact remains, however: on the defensive end of the end of the floor Steve Nash is one of the worst liabilities in the league. Nash simply cannot contain penetration; he is routinely beat off the dribble and he struggles to get back on open shooters.

Sunday’s game was a prime example, with Chauncey Billups able to get anywhere on the floor he wanted to at any time. Mr. Big Shot put up a nice line of 14 points, 11 assists and only 2 TOs… in 20:19 minutes! And it’s not like Billups is one of the quicker points in the NBA, he’s a cagey vet with below-average speed and athleticism. The young guns in the West regularly make Nash look even worse. So why does nobody talk about it?

More Steve Nash bashing that’s sure to angry up the blood after the jump…

In February alone Baron Davis has torn him up for 27 points and 13 assists on 12-of-23 shooting, and closed that game out by hitting three straight baskets. A couple nights before that Chris Paul went off for 42 points and 9 assists on 18-for-33 shooting. These are the types of point guards Phoenix will have to go through on their way to the NBA Finals. And those aren’t freak occurrences, opposing points routinely put up their best numbers against Nash and the Suns. According to 82games.com opponent’s point guards average an All Star line of 21 points and 7.4 assists on 49.8% FGs. That’s killing Phoenix night in, night out.

Now, we should also point out that statistics of all varieties are inflated in dealing with the Phoenix Suns. They are consistently among the league leaders in total possessions per game simply because they run so much. But that doesn’t let Nash off the hook for his complete inability to stop anybody, especially in late-game situations. He’s gotten so bad in the final minutes that it seems prudent to sub him out of the game on key defensive possessions. Does that sound like an MVP? Again, he’s a great player, but an MVP to me is a guy with a complete game who does it on both ends of the floor — not a guy who consistently hurts your chances of winning with his play on one end. A player like Chris Paul, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett or Kobe Bryant (who was better than Nash in each of his MVP seasons).

To be fair, the Suns have also been a weak defensive team as a whole. A big part of that has been Amare Stoudemire, a sub-par defender. But this year the Suns have been strong on the wing, with Raja Bell and Shawn Marion playing well all year and even Grant Hill being serviceable. On average this season, the only player in the Suns’ regular rotation to cause a higher opponent’s scoring average per minute is Leandrinho Barbosa.

The Phoenix Suns made the trade for Shaq because they didn’t think they could keep up with low-post teams in the West without a true center. And Steve Kerr may be right, perhaps it’s not possible to win the West without a presence in the paint. But Phoenix currently leads the NBA with 49.2% FGs, and they finished fifth in the NBA last season with 43.8 points in the paint per game. Amare Stoudemire’s 23.7 points per game are the most among all power forwards and centers. The trade for a center wasn’t so much to address scoring inside as it was for defense, which has been the major concern with the team since Nash came to town. Maybe it’s time to question the other end of the key: can they win an NBA title with such porous defense from their point guard?

In a Western Conference playoffs featuring offensively talented points of all ilks, bulls who excel at penetration like Deron Williams, Chris Paul, Tony Parker, Jason Kidd and Baron Davis, I don’t think they can.

Addendum: Some people in the comments below have asked for stats which show a more direct correlation between Nash and defensive inefficiency, so here’s something else to consider: The season before the Nash came to Phoenix in 03-04 the Suns held opposing teams to 97.9 points per. They’ve given up over 102 points per in each season since.

Meanwhile, the Dallas Mavericks gave up 100.8 (second-most in the NBA) in 03-04, Nash’s last season. In the four seasons since his departure they’ve given up only 96.8 per, 93.1 per, 92.8 and 95.1 per while climbing into the NBA’s top ten in defensive efficiency. They also made it to the NBA Finals in 2006, something they never did before Nash left as a free agent. The Suns haven’t made it there with Nash either.


Tags: Steve Nash, NBA MVP, Phoenix Suns

Posted by Andrew Thell on Feb. 25, 2008 at 11:06 pm in NBA, NBA Fantasy News

291 Responses

I wonder if the better fit for what the Suns were looking for might have been Jermaine O’Neal or Ben Wallace?

Posted by: Shinons on February 26th, 2008 at 8:59 am

Steve Nash is a two time MVP

Posted by: Jack on February 26th, 2008 at 9:12 am

I am right there with you on this one, Mr. Thell. I’ve been calling Nash overrated for years. You’re dead on about his defense, and what most people don’t mention is that the Nash-led Mavs were very similar to his Suns: a potent, smooth-passing offense with a weak defense that could never make it to the Finals.

As you said, he’s an excellent player, but I guess I just don’t see what his MVP voters see.

Posted by: Jeremy on February 26th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

I think the fact that Nash won back-to-back MVPs is exactly why he is overrated. For a guy to do that, IMO, he should not be such a defensive liability (as the author points out), and at the very least he should have at least made one Finals appearance. When you look at the incredible amount of hugely talented players Nash has been surrounded with for the last 8-10 years or so, the fact that he’s never been able to take any of those teams to the Finals is a huge, huge argument against how good he really is.

He was teamed with Dirk, Antawn Jamison, Josh Howard, Antoine Walker, Nick Van Exel and hardly won any playoff games at all with that team. Then with all the guys he’s been paired with in Phoenix he still has yet to even reach the Finals. His leaving Dallas as a free agent and them suddenly going to the Finals afterwards doesn’t help his credibility either.

He’s obviously a great player, no doubt, but I have to feel that a guy who is supposed to be so legendary for making his teammates better, wouldn’t a player like that be winning championships if you surrounded him with guys who are already All Star talents? After all, if you can’t raise the game of All Star teammates to a championship level, how much better are you really making them?

Posted by: WildYams on February 26th, 2008 at 12:53 pm

There’s no way you can call him overrated. People are so quick to jump one way or the other, they forget there’s a middle ground. This article is a perfect example of even reporting. Nash has done incredible things for this team offensively, and basically made the franchise a crapload of money, which in the real world, is what’s it’s really all about. This alone makes up for his defensive shortcomings to the owners. To me, since he’s been there awhile, his teammates should understand his defensive liabilities and be ready to help at any time. I completely agree he gets worked by other gaurds, but when you’re talking about gaurds like Chauncey and Baron, ther’re both very physical gaurds who can post up Nash, and there’s not a thing he can do about it. Chris Paul is just too quick for him. Again, this is not to defend Nash and say he’s a good defensive player, it’s just that his team should have adapted to his weaknesses by now, that’s what great teams do.
My bigger dissapointment comes from Stoudemire who, since learning he’ll be moving back to the 4, has decided that has freed him from ALL responsibilities beyond scoring. UH, DUDE, you still have to rebound and defend, you know that right?

Posted by: Sky on February 26th, 2008 at 1:26 pm

steve nash is cold in basketball and there is nothing wrong with him. he is perfectly fine. he’s just stressed from the games and needs to just sit down and relax. then he’ll be just fine. trust me. that’s what i do when i’m stressed about a basketball game. i relax and then the skills just come to me. let him rest for a while.

Posted by: Chasidy Gobert on February 26th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

Isn’t this basically just a rehash of the same arguments against Nash that have been circulating ever since he won his first MVP? Sure, the numbers of opposing PGs have been updated, but again, the whole “Chauncey Billups lit Steve argument” was used against Nash in his second MVP run. MVPs can’t be defensive liabilities? Is Dirk a stopper? How about A.I., whose only defensive ability is to float around in the passing lanes and gamble for steals. Magic Johnson was a poor defender too…remember when Sleepy Floyd used to light him up, including 51 points in a playoff game? Same with Bird, who consistently took guys like John Koncak and Bill Laimbeer instead of opposing SFs. Remember Bob McAdoo’s MVP? MVP doesn’t mean “perfect in every aspect of the game.”

Nash and the Suns have their share of defensive problems, yes. Will it kill them in the playoffs? We’ll see.

Posted by: basketbawful on February 26th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

Michael Jordan was totally overrated when he was with the Wizards. Greatest basketball player ever? As if!

Posted by: The_Overdog on February 26th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

steve nash looks like ken waller in that photo

Posted by: Phil Anselmo on February 26th, 2008 at 2:38 pm

I felt kinda bad for that guy in “Pumping Iron.”

Posted by: Brian Spencer on February 26th, 2008 at 2:41 pm

Fun fact to know and tell:

Mavs D during 6 years with Nash: 97.4 ppg
Since: 94.4, in an era when scoring has been steadily rising.

Posted by: gjdodger on February 26th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

Hey basketbawful-

If this were an article about how he might not deserve the MVPs, we’ve seen that before. Aside from all of that, I’m saying Steve Nash is overrated even when he’s not in the MVP race (as he shouldn’t be considered one of the top five candidates for the award this season).

The main point we come to here, which I’m not sure I’ve seen anywhere before, is that the Phoenix Suns CAN’T win an NBA title BECAUSE of Steve Nash.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

The NBA is not a individual defensive game. That’s not how it works. Baron Davis is going to get his points no matter who is guarding him when he is has it going. So my question to y’all is who is the best defensive point guard in the game now? And to say Kobe was better than Nash in both of Nash’s MVP years is a tad ludicrous considering the Lakers were so bad then. Basketball is a team game. This subject is trite.

Posted by: dan d on February 26th, 2008 at 3:04 pm

“steve nash is cold in basketball and there is nothing wrong with him. he is perfectly fine. he’s just stressed from the games and needs to just sit down and relax. then he’ll be just fine. trust me. that’s what i do when i’m stressed about a basketball game. i relax and then the skills just come to me. let him rest for a while.

Posted by: Chasidy Gobert”

You’re not in the NBA. Nash’s expectations are a tad higher than people’s basketball expectations of you. And relax? They’re in the Western Conference: every game is important. No time to relax.

His teammates need to pick up his slack on D, or they’re not going anywhere this year: period.

Posted by: Kevin on February 26th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Andrew Thell smokes pole.

Posted by: god on February 26th, 2008 at 3:08 pm

Nash is a very unique player in several respects:

*that rare 2-time mvp who hasn’t sniffed a final

*that rare 2-time mvp with all-star caliber players at multiple position who gets all the credit for their performances

*that rare 2-time mvp who yields career scoring nights to steve blake (you didn’t even have to use the baron davis example. take a look at how many bums have set career highs against nash)

*that rare 2-time mvp who gets all the credit for teammates’ success yet very little if any blame for their failure to ever progress out of the west.

*can you imagine if ANY other big name has Marion, Amare, and Barbosa on his team and got taken 7 games by the Lakers 2 years back? If LeBron or Kobe couldn’t make the fnals with that lineup, what’s the over/under on how many columnists would be salivating to pen poison pieces about them? Yet when Nash fails, hardly a peep. In fact, Marc Stein at espn actually wrote glowingly of Nash after playoff LOSSES on multiple occasions! Uncanny.

*Nash isn’t even the best pg in Suns history (KJ was better, with less talent around him until Barkley arrived, at which point KJ was approaching the downside of his career).

Posted by: obvi on February 26th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

The main point we come to here, which I’m not sure I’ve seen anywhere before, is that the Phoenix Suns CAN’T win an NBA title BECAUSE of Steve Nash.

Well, I’ve been writing that for years, so I agree with ya’ll. Or rather, I think the Suns have to do more to shore up their defense, if you are going to play with a defensive liabilities like Nash (and Amare)… you need guys like Bell on the perimeter, and you need a legit force in the paint. That’s why I liked the idea behind the Shaq trade - move Amare out of the paint; that’s a good step. Shaq, though, may not be the proper answer. Really you need a young Ben Wallace or a young Mutumbo.

Oh, and a huge +1 to obvi’s comment, for laying out the “Nash should not be MVP” argument nicely.

Posted by: stopmikelupica on February 26th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

Excellent article. People may agree or disagree, but you raise some worthwhile points and allow people to take a side pro or con. That is good work.

Personal take — Nash is so far ahead of the curve offensively (18-11-4, while shooting 51% overall and44% from 3) that even poor defense at the PG spot diminishes him only slightly. I mean, who are your good PG defenders? Not a long list.

I will say that the one thing that always struck me as odd is that people vote for Nash for MVP and then vote for Amare and Marion as first-team all-NBA. Um, they have THREE of the best 5 guys in the league!?!? Are they 80 and 2 on the year?

Posted by: hm on February 26th, 2008 at 4:03 pm

Steve Nash is White.

Posted by: Harold Reemus on February 26th, 2008 at 4:17 pm

What would you say about a former MVP that averaged only 15 points and 4 assists per game? Would you say that player wasn’t good enough to win MVP?

What if I told you that player was Bill Russell?

Posted by: rwmonty on February 26th, 2008 at 4:52 pm

Somebody get this rwmonty guy out of here, he’s creepin me out.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 5:14 pm

Over rated? Are you kiding me?

Posted by: clayton on February 26th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

This is the most ridiculus thing I’ve ever heard. Steve Nash deserves an MVP for every season he’s played for the Suns. He is extremely versatile and can make a shot from anywhere on the floor. Just because he isn’t quite as good as he is because getting older (a natural thing in an NBA career), does not mean that he is over rated. He still as good, if not better than players in their prime.

And I believe that it is spelled Leandro Barbosa

Posted by: Sydney on February 26th, 2008 at 6:06 pm

nash has always been a defensive liability, but thats no new information, by the way i doubt there are many pgs in the league who pick up more charges per game than nash, or know how to play better team D. Nash is the most unathletic and weakest players in the league, his small body can’t bang with the bigger guards, and his slow feet keep him from staying with the quicks. What’s amazing is how he still runs an offense as well as he does.

Posted by: kevin quirk on February 26th, 2008 at 6:11 pm

On most nights, the all-star point guards were usually guarded by Marion or Bell. You look at those statistics that PG average against PHX…and you blame it on Nash. That is so inaccurate since Nash doesn’t always cover the PG during games. The team is overall to blame, if they don’t win it this year. Sure you can let a player score 50 points…but the chances a player leading the team in points will win a series in the play offs? Look at the Lakers, the past two playoffs against the Suns. Sure Nash has bad defense but he makes it up with his offense.

Posted by: Someone on February 26th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

Leandrinho, which means “Little Leandro,” is an old nickname from Barbosa’s days in Brazil.

And as I said above:

“There’s the obvious caveat here: Steve Nash is a great player. He’s unquestionably the catalyst which has transformed Phoenix’s offense into the best and most exciting in the NBA over the last four seasons. In terms of smooth passing skills, court vision, ball-handling and pure shooting Nash is the best player in the league.”

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 6:34 pm

Wow. This article is amazingly uninformed/stupid. Check out your stats, buddy. Have the Suns ever played better defense with Steve Nash off the floor? The answer is: No. Consider your argument total and complete poop.

Posted by: Vlad S on February 26th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

Hold up steve nash is cold hes the best point gaurd since Magic.Hes got the wettest shot in the NBA GET OFF HIS BACK.

Posted by: JOSE BRICIO on February 26th, 2008 at 6:44 pm

It’s debatable whether he should’ve won..but the fact is..the suns won all those regular season games when he was MVP, and Nash was the catalyst in all this. The individual game’s where Nash didn’t play great D is so flawed..every PG will get lite up…Personally, I think the article is alot of bias…it doesn’t seem to convince me and I was never a suns fan..Those arguments are just not remotely good enough to counter the great skill and things Nash has done.

Posted by: Basketball on February 26th, 2008 at 6:52 pm

The season before the Nash came to Phoenix in 03-04 the Suns held opposing teams to 97.9 points per. They’ve given up over 102 points per in each season since.

Meanwhile, the Dallas Mavericks gave up 100.8 (second-most in the NBA) in 03-04, Nash’s last season. In the four seasons since his departure they’ve given up only 96.8 per, 93.1 per, 92.8 and 95.1 per while climbing into the NBA’s top ten in defensive efficiency. They also made it to the NBA Finals in 2006, something they never did before Nash left as a free agent. And the Suns haven’t made it there with Nash either. In the playoffs you can’t just run and gun, the games slow down to half-court basketball and making defensive stops becomes critical. With Nash on the floor that’s hard to do.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 6:58 pm

Steve Nash overrated??? are you kidding me??? Two time MVP not deserved? hmmm.. He deserved last year’s too.
He might not be a better defensive player, but he has so many high points in his game that defense doesn’t show at all.

and for anyone who’s arguing about Steve Nash is already playing with all-star caliber players… before Steve Nash got into Phoenix, I remember Stephan Marbury was there and he had the same “Shawn Marion + Amare” combo + Joe Johnson, and from what I remember they had the WORST record in the west that year!!! next year Steve Nash came in and a 40 game-wins turnaround!!!
Steve Nash overrated??? are you kidding me???

Posted by: shora on February 26th, 2008 at 6:59 pm

How many NBA titles are won in the regular season?

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 7:01 pm

There is no way Nash should have won back to back MVPs. Kobe averaged 35 a game and scored 81 against Toronto. His defense is weak and come on people, I’m tired of hearing how he is the best offensive point guard, I mean let me have Amare our Marion, Barbosa, Diaw to pass to. Or let me put it like this, Nash in Dallas great offense but no finals, Nash on the Suns great offense no finals, and and and…didnt Dallas go to the finals without Nash…MVPs are the best PLAYERS, not the best offensive players. Kidd to me is still better, no he cant shoot, but he passes, rebounds and plays D

Posted by: kris on February 26th, 2008 at 7:03 pm

Since when can one player win the game, Steve Nash is the best point guard in the league right now. Nash is an mvp because he makes everyone around him much better. Have u ever sit down and seen how the suns play without him in the floor. He will shock the sceptics out there when we sweep the lakers and win the championship

Posted by: jorge on February 26th, 2008 at 7:08 pm

It’ll be interesting to see whether people finally start to give Shawn Marion the props he’s due now that he’s left and the Suns have started to decline.

On a different note, how can anyone say that Steve Nash is overrated? Yes, his defence isn’t as strong as Kobe or Raja or probably a dozen guards in the league, but look at his scoring and assist numbers people!!!! We’re talking about Chris Paul being an MVP contender for playing basically the same game as Nash, yet Paul is still behind in his assist averages. Steve Nash is not the most athletic guy in the league and yet he’s been able to elevate and develop people like Amare and Shawn to All-Star status. How many people has Kobe helped to develop? Steve Nash overrated? People are kidding themselves.

Posted by: Dan on February 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm

The “did he deserve those MVPs” argument is certainly touched on — briefly — but I think the main crux of Andrew’s well-thought out editorial is whether or not Nash’s well-known defensive liabilities are going to play a big part in holding the Suns back from winning a title. (If they somehow make it to the NBA Finals this season, and face the Detroit Pistons, I say “yes.”)

And I think it’s also important to note, as Andrew has a few times, that this editorial does not in any way demean his prolific *offensive* talents, efficiency, and leadership.

Posted by: Brian Spencer on February 26th, 2008 at 7:21 pm

This is basically a rip on Steve Nash comment fest, give the dude props for being the greatest passer of all time, for being one of the most pure PG shots playing today and for turning the Suns from a slightly about average team to one of the Contenders year after year…

His offensive power makes his defense irrelevant quite frankly…

Both coaches and players alike all recognise that he is still one of the best point guard to play the game…

And plus the guy is 34, how many 34 year old point guards would walk into the starting role on ANY team in the L (Only 1… Jason Kidd)

Quash the beef and let they guy ball…

Posted by: P David on February 26th, 2008 at 7:21 pm

I guess this all comes down to what an MVP means.

For me, it is being “the man” in your team. Being the leader and an unquestionable threat on the floor. Nash was like that for the Suns during his first year, when he transformed the team into the offensive machine it has been for a while now.

And remember, the MVP is for the best player for the REGULAR SEASON not the playoffs.

Steve Nash was like that during the first year, but I really don’t think he deserved it the second time around. There were just much better players during the following season

Posted by: EEE on February 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm

People have forgotten the seasons that Steve Nash won the MVP. The Suns consistently beat Kobe and the Lakers, including in the playoffs. The Cavaliers weren’t the team they are now. Dwight Howard and Chris Paul were still developing.

When Steve Nash was out for any length of time the Suns tanked. The Spurs have beat the Suns (with the help of a stupid league ruling to take out the Suns best players when the tide of the playoffs was turning), but they are an all-around excellent team.

I think Kobe is the MVP this year, but two years ago? No way.

Posted by: bill braskie on February 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm

Who does Andrew Thell think he is? He is about to say that the Phoenix Suns can’t win an NBA Championship without Steve Nash? Nash is the leader of their team, without him, they would not be one of the top contenders in the west. He deserved to win his to back to back MVP awards. Just look at the Suns’ records before he came back to Phoenix. The 2003-2004 season, Phoenix had a 29-53 record. The next year, which was Nash’s return, they had the league best and franchise tying record of 62-20. All because of Steve Nash. In the 05-06 season, their record was 54-28 because of the absence of Amare Stoudemire. The next season, 06-07, they had the second best record in the NBA with 61 wins and 21 losses. And this year, they are still right up there with the top elite teams in the west. Anyone to call Steve Nash overrated and not deserving his two MVP honors clearly does not know what they are talking about.

Posted by: sunsfan on February 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm

Just to restate the issue here: it is NOT whether or not Steve Nash deserved the MVPs in past seasons. It is whether or not Steve Nash is overrated, and whether or not his terrible defense has held his teams back from postseason success.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 7:25 pm

steve nash overrated??? I don’t think so, I think he deserved MVP coz phoenix without him(whenever he injured) was like a ship without a captain. They Sink!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: mike on February 26th, 2008 at 7:28 pm

Steve Nash can have an impact on the defensive end, he has always been great at drawing charges. He is not a horrible defensive player, just average. Chris Paul is excellent of course, but there are not many good defensive guards. Nash just concentrates more on the offensive end, considering that is the Suns offense. When you say that the Suns can’t win a championship with Nash, I really don’t think they have a shot without him. You forget that their record went from one of the worst to the best. It wasn’t Amare or Marion, it was Nash. I think Amare is the biggest disappointment because he is a liability on the defensive end, otherwise the Suns would not have gotten Shaq. Rasheed Wallace pretty much owned Amare on Sunday. If he could improve his D as much as shot, then the Suns will have much better chances. If Nash shouldn’t have to worry so much about penetration if there is an Amare Stoudemire in the paint. Amare’s D with Nash’s great offense is the key to a championship.

Posted by: heyheyhey on February 26th, 2008 at 7:28 pm

“Does that sound like an MVP? Again, he’s a great player, but an MVP to me is a guy with a complete game who does it on both ends of the floor — not a guy who consistently hurts your chances of winning with his play on one end. A player like Chris Paul, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett or Kobe Bryant (who was better than Nash in each of his MVP seasons).”

Sorry Andrew, the part where you wrote how Steve Nash doesn’t “sound like an MVP” confused me. It made me think you were writing about Steve Nash not deserving to be the MVP.

Posted by: bill braskie on February 26th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

steve nash is not overrated. he is a two-time mvp for a reason. being an mvp is not about being a complete player. if that was the case bryant or lebron should have gotten it before nash. but that didn’t happen, right? mvp is about a guy leading the team to a win. a guy who can control and lead the franchise and at the same time, the team will struggle without him. steve nash was that man for the suns.

Posted by: nikko13 on February 26th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

dude mvps are voted on by sportswriters, so he can be a two time mvp and overrated. the reason he is an mvp is becuase he is overrated. I think he should have won the first, but Kobe Bryant was the clear choice in his second year. If u recall, that was the year Kobe lit up the league averaging 35.4 ppg, while taking a team that started Kwame Brown, Smush Parker, AND luke walton to 45 wins out west. The man broke records, had 81 in one game, and outscored the mavs 62-61 in the three quarters he played that game. If thats not an mvp, i dont no what it

Posted by: BIGO on February 26th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

how can you be an MVP when no one respects your D?

Posted by: m on February 26th, 2008 at 7:49 pm

The Suns look worse and worse every game with this Shaq trade. You can’t change a run and gun offense to a half court style and expect success in one third of a season. What if the Suns don’t do well for the remainder of the season and end up a low playoff seed. If they’re knocked out quickly even if they stretch it to seven games, will people start to give Shawn Marion more credit to how valuable he was for those teams? Steve Nash definitely has had more than ample support his whole career. Something that Kobe has lacked for the last few seasons until this point. Phoenix will see more of the same in the playoffs from the Lakers that they saw in that game last week. We can play any style of basketball they choose to now with our revamped offense. Basically, we once again have the Suns number and their short run at the top of the Pacific is over.

Posted by: Lakersontop13 on February 26th, 2008 at 7:49 pm

There’s a few points I’d like to make.

1)Those of you that say his offense makes up for his D is wrong. Last I checked, all teams since the Spurs in 02-03 season have won championships from D. And all those teams had better defensive PG’s than Nash.

2)The arguement that other PGs don’t play D is pointless. At least some of them make up for it by STEALING the ball.

3)Whoever said Nash deserved it all these years is wrong. His 1st was pretty much legit, but since then others deserved it more(Kobe and Lebron). Even without Nash, the Suns would still be a playoff team(Not as good though), while the Cavs and Lakers wouldn’t be in the playoffs if it wasn’t for Kobe and Lebron.

I’m not saying Nash is a bad player. If I want an offensive PG for my team, I’d take Nash. But he is still over-rated.

Posted by: Mike McKenzie on February 26th, 2008 at 7:52 pm

an article from a pro-Bryant-sh*t guy…

tsk tsk tsk…

pure bias… your an a-hole…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

I felt like you read my mind and wrote this article.

I also agree with giving the award to a player on a good team but I don’t think it should be limited to a top 1 or 2 team, a playoff team atleast but looking at the team with the best record and having to pick the MVP from that roster while you’ve got guys like Kobe and LeBron ripping up the league with no help on their team is just unfair. (I’m speaking about last season by the way, I know they have help this season)

And as dirk and LeBron showed us last season, leading your team to the most wins doesn’t mean leading your team to the finals.

Posted by: tom on February 26th, 2008 at 8:03 pm

Steve Nash is a two-time MVP.. Period. That’s why he was chosen to be the MVP and won back-to-back is because he makes bsketball very easy on his team. He makes his teammates very good and at that time they had the best record. That’s an MVP. and Phoenix is not a defensive team, they are an offensive team, so what will you expect?

Posted by: Jasey Rae on February 26th, 2008 at 8:04 pm

Ok, I’ll bite: Kobe is a seven-time selection to the NBA’s All Defensive team. And, with the exception of 05-06 (4.5 assists) when he had nobody to pass to, Kobe also has averaged at least 5.0 assists for each of the last nine years. No other SGs or SFs have racked up so many dimes. So, we’re talking about stellar offense, multiple titles, incredible clutch performances, great playoff track record, incredible prolonged distribution, the best perimeter defender in the NBA over the last decade (nuts to Bruce bowen, he’s a hack), a guy who can score 81 points in a game, and the best closer in the NBA (except for perhaps that new kid, Le-something) … I’m just not seeing the holes in his game. Nash is great. Kobe is better.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

In reply to Andrew Thell - “How many NBA titles are won in the regular season?”
The MVP award is based solely on the regular season which shows the Suns as having the best record over the past 3 season. I agree MVPs should take their teams to the finals (although their have been some fantastic players not get there), but MVPs are all about making their teammates better. Do you think Stoudamire or Marion would be better players playing with Iverson (or to a lesser extent Baron Davis)? I think not. Both would be having lesser numbers (and most likely requested a trade to a team that would be able to make them “the man”.

Posted by: Thommo on February 26th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

None, thats why he won the REGULAR SEASON MVP, not the FINALS MVP. As pointed out above, He led the suns to the best record in the NBA (correct me if im wrong) coming off a very bad season. His next season with them he still led the team to one of the top records in the league, without amare, and he even helped boris diaw win his MIP award. That being said, I believe he deserved to be the MVP on both those occasions, because of the fact that he was the most valuable player in their team and using this as my argument, I definitely believe that Steve Nash is NOT overrated.

Posted by: lakerboy on February 26th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

First I think youhave a point in saying that Nash has problems containing other point guards, but I think he still is a worthy MVP, he is the reason the Phoenix suns went from nobody to the best show in sneakers, he is the engine of that transformation. Seriously you have to admit they have been the most fun team to watch in the last few years.
Also the argument that the mavs have improved their defense is hard to correlate with Nash, he couold be part of the reason but also, very important in their defensive improvement is Avery Johnson as a coach… remember he was in San Antonio and he always talked about improving the D.
As for the suns steve always risks his body taking charges on D and also he has a mental toughnes that you surely would want in the clutch… remeber the doble OT classis vs the mavs last season, anyone? So part of the defensive problems of the suns are the lack of understanding in the rotations and the lack of boxing out poeple not allowing second chance points and that is a team effort not a one man thing.
Anyway he IS a 2 time MVP and you can argue what you want but he’s got the tropies.

Posted by: Alvaro Diaz on February 26th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

**None, thats why he won the REGULAR SEASON MVP, not the FINALS MVP. As pointed out above, He led the suns to the best record in the NBA (correct me if im wrong) coming off a very bad season. His next season with them he still led the team to one of the top records in the league, without amare, and he even helped boris diaw win his MIP award. That being said, I believe he deserved to be the MVP on both those occasions, because of the fact that he was the most valuable player in their team and using this as my argument, I definitely believe that Steve Nash is NOT overrated.

Posted by: lakerboy on February 26th, 2008 at 8:11 pm **

well said…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 8:19 pm

Um, Kobe better then Nash in both Nash’s MVP seasons? I am sorry, but which player’s team didn’t even make it into the playoffs in 2004-2005? (Hint, it wasn’t Phoenix!!) Also, which team won the series between Phoenix and L.A. in the playoffs and made it to the conference finals to lose by 6? (Hint, it wasn’t L.A.!!). One last thing: Baskedball is a TEAM game. Meaning even if one player scores 81 points in a game, amazing as that is, it doesn’t change the fact that his team finished only 2 games above 500 and 7th in their conference.

Conclusion: Kobe Bryant cannot be considered ranked above Steve Nash for the MVP award in both 04-05 and 05-06. No way, no how.

Posted by: PJ on February 26th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

This guy is smoking some cheap weed!!!

Posted by: Brian on February 26th, 2008 at 8:29 pm

give Nash his due…

this year, i won’t be having any problem if Kobe/Lebron/Garnett (Kobe leading) will be the MVP because their individual and team stat/performance shows it… either of the three will win the MVP this year…

but saying Nash is overrated and that Kobe is better in Nash’ MVP year… either your blind, your a moron/stupid (like Kerr), or your just playing silly…

Nash deserves his MVP, Dirk deserves his MVP…

and You don’t have the right to discredit them…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Clearly you don’t know what you’re writing about.
The last three baskets scored by B-Diddy were scored on Grant Hill, not Nash. When the best player of another team gets hot, what can you do?
So who is to blame when Kobe dropped 81 on the Raptors?
Kobe didn’t win MVP because his team barely made the playoffs.
Why don’t you give the mvp to Ricky Davis back in the cavs, or Jerry Stackhouse when he led the league in scoring?

Posted by: madair on February 26th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

How are team stats such as ppg against relevant?

Of course teams will score less ppg against Dallas now - they don’t run as much - and Nash isn’t the only personnel change on that team.

Lots of All-Star teammates? Seen them try and score with Nash off the floor? Billups has had all-star team mates in Hamilton, and the Wallaces’.

It is obvious he is not the most individually talented but another measure of MVP is how good is the team without him and Phoenix would suck - remember Marbury and the Suns. How many games did the Suns improve in Nash’s first year? Nash would have one of the highest +/- numbers in the league for time on court.

Call him over rated if you want - but if I had a choice to watch any team in the league, I’m picking a Nash led Phoenix.

Posted by: Mark on February 26th, 2008 at 8:40 pm

Nash and the Suns were the #2 seed in 2006 versus the #7 seed Lakers. Kobe and the Lakers had them down 3-1, but choked away the series due to Smush Parker and Kwame Brown (and finally Odom and everybody else in Game 7). In his MVP season they should have lost in the first round to a much inferior Lakers team. I KNOW the MVP is based on the regular season, but that is precisely the point of the article - a plethora of regular season wins by Nash and the Suns, and two or three or any number of MVP’s does NOT mean he is not overrated (just like Dirk and the Mavs are overrated) unless he can win DEEP IN THE PLAYOFFS.

Posted by: gurf morlix on February 26th, 2008 at 8:46 pm

if MVP’s are based on the players performance on both ends of the court, then sports writers should be considering BRUCE BOWEN as well don’t you think? i mean, the guy can shoot (especially on corners), oh and yeah, one of the toughest defenders in the league.

but nash overrated? i don’t think so.

Posted by: Donny Don on February 26th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

it’s entirely possible that the higher allowed opposing-team points per game occuring whenever nash is present in a team is due to the fact that he increases the overall pace of the game, which allows his opponents to score more (at the same time allowing his teams to score more).

Posted by: anonymous on February 26th, 2008 at 8:51 pm

from Andrew Thell’s post “Nash is great. Kobe is better.”

i totally agree that kobe is better, hell, he’s even the best player in the league. but nash, nash is the MVP.

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

Nash may not be a great defender but flashing stats for the other teams star point guards is very misleading. Against many of the teams you listed Nash does not guard the opposing teams point guard. Before the trade it was often Marion, and recently has been Raja Bell or even Grant Hill.

Posted by: Tim on February 26th, 2008 at 9:11 pm

…WildYams…your stupid…you keep talking about the fact that nash won 2 mvps and thats why hes overrated cuz his team has never made it to the finals…well i dno how much basketball u rly watch, but MVP has nothing to do with playoff stats or final stats…its a regular season award

“After all, if you can’t raise the game of All Star teammates to a championship level, how much better are you really making them?”

are you serious?
the first season nash was named MVP…every other PHX started had career highs in alot of categories…and EVERYONE knows that PHX got robbed in the playoffs the second year nash won mvp by the amare stoudemire suspension and if that stupid rule that u can get off your bench (even to helpa teammate) or else u get suspended wasnt there, PHX would have won that series against SA

and the fact that dallas made the finals without nash? i guess u could have an argument there..but know that nash left dallas in 04…and they made the finals appearence in 06…so thats 2 years…and the only reason dallas did better without him is cuz it opened it up for nowitzki to do what ever he wanted…not cuz nash brought them down

Posted by: haseeb on February 26th, 2008 at 9:13 pm

Listen, to all of you who are wondering “How can Steve Nash be MVP when doesn’t get into the finals every year?” or are wondering “When are people going to stop acknowledging Steve Nash for his offense when his teammates deserve that credit?” Or the most ridiculous of all of these comments I’ve read up above, “The MVP is the best player in the league! Steve Nash is not better than Kobe Bryant!” Listen. The MVP is not the best player in the league, it’s the most valuable during the SEASON. Not the Playoffs, not the best player to play the game, the most valuable during that single year. The difference is that Steve Nash stays healthy almost every single year even though he has a weak body, and that when his team is forced to play without them their offense and even their defense looks even more atrocious then usual. Don’t get me wrong, Steve Nash’s defense is horrible, and I’m a huge Nash fan, but you can’t knock him and say people like Jason Kidd who can’t even score the basketball as a guard are better. Great teams have centers and power forwards, they don’t need point guards that can rebound; they need ones who can lead a good offense, score, and help their teammates make buckets [assists]. Name a team that as of late that has won a championship without a wonderful Center or Forward. If you think Jason Kidd would have all of those triple doubles on a real team like San Antonio who has bigs, you’re sadly mistaken.

Even if you don’t want to admit it, I will point out all of Steve Nash’s good points and what he does every night. He has the best shot in the league when it comes to point guards and the highest percentage, he runs the smoothest offense in the NBA [which I suppose can be chalked up to his teammates too], there isn’t a player [today] more clutch or calm in game winning situations as Steve Nash, in one of his worst scoring nights where he went 0-4 at the start of a game last season, he completely stopped shooting and gave his teammates a franchise, season high, and highest that year of 21 assists against the Cavs [who Spurs coach Gregg Popovich admitted had the most underrated defense in the league, and are one of the best in tight situations], and a meager 4 points, meaning that when Nash can’t get hot from the court that he can focus only on court vision and light you up significantly on his worst night. Yes, he put up like 8 and 5 since Shaq came around, but have you forgotten that most of Steve Nash’s assists came from the Stoudemire pick and roll and Shawn Marion? Can you at least wait until the team adjusts to losing one of the most consistent and underrated players in history [Shawn Marion], or until Shaq gets in shape enough to run the pick and roll with Nash? I guess not, huh?

Should Kobe have won the MVP either year that Nash won it? Maybe, but it’s very arguable when you look at what Kobe does for his club day in and day out, however you have to look at the fact that the NBA really hates giving the MVP to players on horrible teams too, and if you ask any coach what he thinks a good player does for a team, he won’t tell you score, he’s going to tell you he makes everyone on his team better every night which Kobe can’t do anywhere near an excellent point guard can period.

On another subject, Kobe Bryant is the best player in the game currently, but every year that he’s won a championship, he’s had huge help. Did Kobe and Shaq win the championship the first year they got together? No, I think it took as many as five for even the dynamic duo to get a championship, so don’t make it sound like Nash has had all the time in the world to win one, and just tune in to see if he lives up to the hype.

Posted by: LethaL BoSS on February 26th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

Why isn’t Nash guarding the opposing team’s point guard? Isn’t the fact that he’s incapable of doing so, that he has to be hidden on defense, an indictment in and of itself?

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 9:19 pm

Nash is definately not overated. His MVP’s were not based on his great offensive skill or poor defensive skill but his ability to make his teammates better. Scrubs like raja bell and leandro barbosa put up double figures and can start on nash’s squad but thew would be weak players on other teams. He creates for the suns. A phoenix team with marion, bell, stoudemire,and barbosa played with another point gaurd called starbury and didn’t do shit.

Posted by: Ian on February 26th, 2008 at 9:25 pm

It’s too bad there’s no position like the designated hitter in basketball, that would suit Steve perfectly. But there’s not. You have to play defense in basketball, and Nash is the only MVP I can think of to be such a horrible liability in 50% of the game.

Imagine if Phil Jackson had to hide MJ on defense, or if Hakeem Olajuwon was unable of guarding David Robinson and Patrick Ewing. To make more of an apples-to-apples comparison, look at John Stockton. Stockton was as great offensively as Nash (if not better), yet was guarding guys like Jordan, Reggie Miller, Magic and so on. Oh, and Stockton was two, three inches shorter than Nash.

Posted by: Kyle on February 26th, 2008 at 9:33 pm

numbers expire with age… Steve Nash is proving that wrong. He is still producing at his past MVP performances along wit hhigh percentages.

and since when has a guard ever had the expectations on the defensive end of the floor. Now i have nothing against that, if your gaurds can play some stellar D than hats off (Baron Davis: specifically his work in defending former MVP Dirk in the playoffs last year, nothin more need be said). Now a point gaurd, in specific, his job is to bring the ball down the court, and pass the ball that will or eventually lead to a bucket. Nash does his job. This league is a Forward league, the suns forwards are not doing there job, which is to defend. Amare can score, we can all see that, but his defense has been a liability, why is this conversation of the Suns D concentrated towards Nash when that is not HIS responsibility. It is the teams responsibility. And with Diesel in the big picture, it has already been shown that they are a better defensize squad. But none of this can really be proven untill the playoffs, who cares about the regular season… The Suns have failed as a defensive formation as a team, you can’t put the blame on the pg

I am a Suns fan, not my favourite team, but they are fun to watch, jsut not in the playoff’s. The regular season is all about scoring, the playoffs are about defense, which is boring to wathc most of the time, but if you are a true fan you enjoy all of the little things, which Nash cant do…

Posted by: Nick on February 26th, 2008 at 9:40 pm

Why isn’t Nash guarding the opposing team’s point guard? Isn’t the fact that he’s incapable of doing so, that he has to be hidden on defense, an indictment in and of itself?
—-

i believe that most people would agree that steve’s D is below mediocrity, i wouldn’t even argue with that. but as stated in most comments, he’s got teammates like grant hill and raja bell to fill in that weakness, and steve makes up for it by playing twice as good in the offensive end. that’s the reason why you can’t say that he’s overrated.

i mean, if you’re the coach and your PG allows the guy he’s defending to score 20 points against him, and your PG tries to make up by scoring 20 as well and dish out about 11 assists, isn’t that enough? in PHX’s case i guess that’s more than enough.

and how can you say that PHX’s move to toughen up the defense on the paint is questionable? as far as i’m concerned, SAS beats the hell out of PHX because of TD21, not TP9. now if crtics are expecting steve to go up against TD21, then yeah, steve’s WAAAAAAy overrated.

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

Since when has a guard had the expectations on the defensive end of the floor? Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, John Stockton, even Manu Ginobili. Note that three of the four have multiple rings, and if it wasn’t for MJ, Stockton would likely have one or two.

Posted by: Kyle on February 26th, 2008 at 9:45 pm

“Nash is definately not overated. His MVP’s were not based on his great offensive skill or poor defensive skill but his ability to make his teammates better. Scrubs like raja bell and leandro barbosa put up double figures and can start on nash’s squad but thew would be weak players on other teams. He creates for the suns. A phoenix team with marion, bell, stoudemire,and barbosa played with another point gaurd called starbury and didn’t do shit.
Posted by: Ian on February 26th, 2008 at 9:25 pm”

Don’t forget Joe Johnson, who wasn’t even thought of until Nash joined Phoenix.

Posted by: LethaL BoSS on February 26th, 2008 at 9:47 pm

stockton is not guarding Jordan by himself…

they use stockton so that bigger guys can double/triple team jordan once he get the ball…

stop posting if you do not know basketball…

DEFENSE in basketball is pure team work…

defensive stopper, like BOWEN, is a hacker not a defender…

as i have posted before, GIVE NASH HIS CREDIT…

NASH DESERVES HIS MVPs and NASH is NOT OVERRATED… PERIOD…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 9:47 pm

I already gave Nash his credit. He’s a great offensive player, which I said. But that’s only 50% of the game, and 50% does not an MVP make. Maybe Utah used Stockton as the first cog in double teams, but Nash isn’t even capable of THAT.

Posted by: Kyle on February 26th, 2008 at 9:50 pm

Lethal Boss, Joe Johnson is a pretty poor example considering he’s established himself the last two years without Nash.

Posted by: Kyle on February 26th, 2008 at 9:51 pm

The ppg against are irrelevant. The scoring margin is what counts.A team like the Suns gives up more but scores more so that’s a very flawed argument.

Let’s face it, the Suns sucked whenever Nash wasn’t playing and that’s why he is so valuable; he changes the whole team.

BTW, Karl Malone, Larry Bird,Magic Johnson all won multiple mvps and were all below average defenders.
Larry and Karl in particular were crap one on one defenders.

Posted by: schooner on February 26th, 2008 at 10:00 pm

you are giving NASH half his MVP credit…

Utah is different from Phoenix…

I enjoy Utah’s game (offense and defense)…
and Stockton is one-hell of a point guard…

I enjoy Phoenix’s game more (offense x 2)…
and Nash is an MVP point guard…

As one poster have said, Nash has his MVP trophy…

And all we (or YOU) can do is WHINE about it…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 10:01 pm

I don’t recall who Nash’s main competition was his first season, but I have no qualms with his selection that year (for the most part). But his second one should have gone to Kobe. No one, and I mean no one, thought the Lakers were going to make the playoffs, yet he did get them there. And was one Tim Thomas shot away from sending Phoenix home. But as someone pointed out earlier, the MVP is a joke. My two pieces of evidence. Jason Kidd had the same effect on New Jersey as the Nash-lovers are pointing out he had when he arrived in Phoenix. Kidd finished 2nd to Duncan despite doing the things as Nash, but also playing defense. Secondly, the second year Nash won, Kobe was not in the top 5 of several ballots. Regardless of who you think should have won, you can’t tell me that Kobe didn’t deserve to be in the top 5 that season. But writers vote with bias, and Kobe is not a media darling. He may finally get it this season, but only because it would such an obvious slight that no writer would dare not having him on their list this season.
Lastly, I’m not sure how Nash went from being a solid point guard to being the NBA’s poster boy. I mean, he has great fundamentals — that is one reason. But John Stockton put up Nash numbers for several years, and not once was he in the MVP discussion.

Posted by: JR on February 26th, 2008 at 10:01 pm

Even so, Joe Johnson was a nobody, until Nash did join Phoenix, Kyle, what I mean is Nash is who got him noticed, but it wasn’t until he joined the Hawks and became a one man team that he became an all-star. Kind of like Tony Romo having his incredible season with Terell Owens, not saying that Terell is making him good, but that he brought Romo to stardom. Y’know?

Posted by: LethaL BoSS on February 26th, 2008 at 10:06 pm

Additionally, since my post is not really the FOCUS of the article. I’ve never believed the Suns style could win a title. I’m still on the fence whether that is Nash’s fault in the sense that, without him, they are obviously not the same team. But the recent trade, whether they want to admit it or not, was them conceding that their style was not going to get it done. I actually think it was a bad trade for them, but I guess we’ll see come playoff time.

Posted by: JR on February 26th, 2008 at 10:07 pm

John Stockton put up Nash numbers for several years, and not once was he in the MVP discussion.

two words… MICHAEL JORDAN.

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 10:08 pm

Nash is the best in the league
The suns just traded on of their go to guys (marion) for a slower more clumsy guy (shaq). In order for them to mesh with shaq, things have to change A Bit. I think hat once they get some “team” time under their belt, they will be unstoppable, with nash leading the way.

Posted by: Darren on February 26th, 2008 at 10:11 pm

“Kidd finished 2nd to Duncan despite doing the things as Nash, but also playing defense

But John Stockton put up Nash numbers for several years, and not once was he in the MVP discussion.”

And that’s a regular problem with the voting, the little guy often gets ignored.

One of the main reasons I think Nash rose to prominence is that he and the Suns made the NBA more fun to watch again.

Kobe is an awesome scoring machine but the Lakers games were awful to watch until this year and that’s because watching one guy take all the shots and eat up all the possessions is boring.

Posted by: schooner on February 26th, 2008 at 10:11 pm

Wow. You have got to be kidding me. A player that leads his team, from the worst to the best in one year, isnt an MVP. That just doesnt make sense. And for the second year, teams should have been able to stop him with better defenses right. Nope didn’t happen. And Kobe being an MVP???? No way. He is no doubt the best payer around. But he is not a leader in the locker room like Nash, and he cant win anything without a Big Man(Shaq Bynum Pau) and he does not have the leauge best record in thoses years. And MVP doesnt mean all around greatness, it means MOST VALUABLE PLAYER. not MOST ALL-ARROUND PLAYER. I think Kobe would win that, but for everything Valuble its Nash hands down.

Posted by: NASH=MVP on February 26th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

and since Joe Johnson left for atlanta, he became a certified *loser*…

**John Stockton put up Nash numbers for several years, and not once was he in the MVP discussion.

two words… MICHAEL JORDAN.

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 10:08 pm **

right on target…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

And in the midst of this ongoing discussion, the Memphis Grizzlies are giving Phoenix a game. Looks like the Suns will pull it out, but man, it was much closer than it should be for a few minutes there. Mike Conley has a double-double and is breaking Nash’s ankles- just drew a three-point play on Nash to keep ‘em in it, too.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

19pts.. 12ast.. 27mins.. +12.. 1min to go..

yeah right.. as if ankle-breakers will win games..

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 10:17 pm

And in the midst of this ongoing discussion, the Memphis Grizzlies are giving Phoenix a game. Looks like the Suns will pull it out, but man, it was much closer than it should be for a few minutes there. Mike Conley has a double-double and is breaking Nash’s ankles- just drew a three-point play on Nash to keep ‘em in it, too.

—-
yeah, and steve has a double-double too.. so fair enough.. another night for steve to make up for his oh so horrible defense

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 10:19 pm

15 and 11 so far, the best game of Conley’s young career…

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

for the record, a “stalwart” defense would be a strong, solid one

Posted by: Stephen on February 26th, 2008 at 10:21 pm

Um. I am not awake enough to read the previous 90 comments but. Has anybody commented on whether or not Nash’s offensive contributions outweigh his defensive screw ups? Don’t they kind of cancel eachother? He’s incredible on offense, and perhaps equally horrible on defense. So maybe he just fills that empty space of a point guard, and its on the other 4 guys? Just a thought. Oh yeah, and Shaq sucks ass. He’s gonna keel over of a heart attack. Won’t Bill Walton laugh a lot or what?

Posted by: Jon Jon Mackey on February 26th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

For the record, “irony” means: a: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b: a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

*edit*

25pts.. 13ast.. 8/11fg.. 6/6ft.. +17..

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

I agree with most of your article and I routinely get angry with Nash when he misses a rotation or lets a cutter get to the basket with little interference, however, your “caveat” at the end of this post is very misleading. If you’re going to bring up the season before Nash came, you should also mention the fact that they went from 29 wins to a league-best 62 once he showed up.

Posted by: Joseph on February 26th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

we’re talking basketball.. not english..

anyway, another PHX victory..

got to go.. this article/author SUCKS big-time…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 26th, 2008 at 10:25 pm

Thell many others have won NBA MVP and they are even more controversial then Steve Nash getting one or two for that matter. He is an amazing player offensively making up for his lack fo defensive ability. Also MVP stands for most valuable player = Nash since without him Phoenix is just a mix of players. NO one else performed better then him. If you are talking NBA titles Nash still has a long way to go , get off your pro - American butt because Nash is the real deal. Also i was wondering if this is your job or just a random blog b/c if this is your job then you are not doing a good job.

Posted by: Mike James on February 26th, 2008 at 10:28 pm

Phoenix has been in the top five in point differential in every season since Nash arrived.

That’s how you win games, not on how many points you allow.

Posted by: schooner on February 26th, 2008 at 10:36 pm

Stop Hating on Nash. No point guards play defense. Its the hardest position to defend. The last point guard to play defense was the glove. Just cause you get steals don’t mean your playing good defense. There are no guards that just go out and lock someone up anymore. Nash makes scrubs into stars. And don’t forget they woulda been in the finals last year if it wasn’t for Horry’s cheap shot. Stop hating and this idiot writing this article shouldn’t write anymore.

Posted by: hoop12dreams on February 26th, 2008 at 10:37 pm

The suns wud have made it to the finals last year if the spurs didnt have the lucky breaks the suns lost by 2 games…first off game 1 nash had 2 sit out at a critcal timing.i think it was game 3 the reffs was calling everything on the suns and when the suns were obivisly gettin screwed…game 4 i think it was the suns didnt have amare studemire and boris diaw in the line up. game 1 suns only lost by 5 which i think wudnt of happened if u seen wat nash has done in critcal situations like that 05 mavs game 111-108 5.7 secs nash made the game tieing 3. so i think the suns was screwed last year n the shaq and marion trade i think it was the dumbest trade i seen in a while..for the suns it has been fast scoring dats y last year they were the best offensive team but with shaq i think he slows they down and i think marion rebound just as well as shaq does but he shoots better so b4 u ppl go suns cant make the finals relook everything then say that

Posted by: Matt on February 26th, 2008 at 10:38 pm

off the topic..

a friend once asked me, if i were the coach and there’s only 4 secs left on the clock and my team’s down by 2, who would be the best choice to pass the ball to..

my choice was kobe, for the reason of being the best clutch player in the league.

my friend’s reply was, steve nash. he’s reason? it’s still 4 secs left, if you give it to nash, he’s got a higher percentage of making the shot while keeping in mind that he’s also got 4 teammates to pass to before actually deciding to take the shot. as for kobe, every single being in the stadium that breaths know that he’d take the shot.

Posted by: wbsssh on February 26th, 2008 at 10:41 pm

Steve Nash has not been voted MVP twice because of his defensive ability but for the ability he provides on the offensive side and what he does for his team mates. Just like Jordan what is admired most about Nash is the way he is able to increase the ability of his team mates and others around him. You can’t bring NBA finals status into the argument as the voting is finished before the finals are completed.

Posted by: Mr X on February 26th, 2008 at 10:51 pm

So Nash is overrated. Where should he be rated, then?

Posted by: rwmonty on February 26th, 2008 at 10:52 pm

well no body is perfect, do MJ has a double double on his career? i think not.. Well just wait for the time of the PHX. and i think this year is the time for PHX to win a championship if they dont trade Marion on lazy old Shaq

Posted by: Paul on February 26th, 2008 at 10:52 pm

Steve Nash deserve that back2back MVP because he really played well those seasons and nobody play better than him that time

Posted by: Paul on February 26th, 2008 at 10:57 pm

hmmmmmmmmmm, calling Steve Nash overated is such a cop-out!!!

If my memory serves me correctly, wern’t the Suns pretty terrible before Nash got there???

And two, in the two years he won MVP did’nt they lose pretty much every game he did’nt play in???

And three, is’nt the MVP awarded to the best player on a good team during the season and ‘not’ the playoff” (thats what playoff mvp is for duh) who makes a difference on that team? ie indepencible to that team (who is winning) ie steve nash…

And four, it seems to me it is only bitter Kobe fans who call Nash un-deserving and overated… How can you give a guy the MVP on a 7th or 8th seeded team?

Wish the Bobcats had Nash damn we suck. GW for MVP yeah we’re nearly as good as the Lakers were before Bynum decided to play and Gasol got there!

ps isn’t AI a pretty rubbish defender does that make him underserving???

Posted by: nick on February 26th, 2008 at 11:01 pm

“Stop hating and this idiot writing this article shouldn’t write anymore.” - hoop12dreams

amen

Posted by: sunsfan on February 26th, 2008 at 11:03 pm

Steve Nash doesn’t guard good opposing scorers. Raja Bell guards Chris Paul, Baron Davis, etc. This article is a terrible argument. Opponent PG numbers against the Suns don’t reflect on Nash, since he doesn’t guard the more scoring-oriented PGs. Why did you not even consider this in the article?

Posted by: Anonymous on February 26th, 2008 at 11:05 pm

Get your facts straight, dude.

Suns only allowed 102 points last year, and again 102 points the year before.

And the opposing PG average 21 points and 7.4 assists. But the Suns PG average 24 points and 13 assists.

What a lame article.

Posted by: R on February 26th, 2008 at 11:06 pm

In the interest of full disclosure:

Over the last four seasons with Nash in the fold the Suns have gone 4-12 in the 16 games that Nash has missed. He’s clearly a great player who helps them win in the regular season. He’s likely the best offensive player in the NBA, certainly the most pure offensive player, and I don’t dispute that.

If the Suns pull out a title or even make it to the NBA Finals with Nash leading the way, I’ll eat my words. I just don’t think it will happen.

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 11:08 pm

You are retarded, I mean cmon now. Steve Nash is the best point guard in the NBA flat out…most assists sets his team up the best, what else do you need. Granted yea…he doesnt have the best defense or the best stealing ability. I didn’t read the whole thing just because it doesnt even deserve that…i mean this article is probably the most idiotic thing written…ever.

You probably….probably….forgot to mention that he is the best shooting point guard with great percentages like 50 fg% 90 ft% and 45 3pt%. You also probably forgot to mention that he averages the most assists in the league. You also probably forgot to mention that he raised the record of the phoenix suns from a terrible 19 game winning record to an amazing 62-20. You might have forgotten to write that he has averaged 10+ assists in his last three years.

But hey…you forgot. It’s a mistake…its not like you have something against him because…you might…might be a Kobe Bryant fan…huh?

Don’t write ever again….and I’m being nice

Posted by: Chris on February 26th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

I’m the guy who wrote the comment at 11:10 pm now reading some of the comments…doesnt seem like many people agree with you….RETARD

you’re a moron, hater and most of all flat out an idiot who doesnt know anything about basketball

i hope someone didnt pay you to write this….you just disgrace the game of basketball loser

Posted by: Chris on February 26th, 2008 at 11:13 pm

For those of you joining the discussion late and too lazy to read the whole thing, I’ll post this excerpt from the article again:

“There’s the obvious caveat here: Steve Nash is a great player. He’s unquestionably the catalyst which has transformed Phoenix’s offense into the best and most exciting in the NBA over the last four seasons. In terms of smooth passing skills, court vision, ball-handling and pure shooting Nash is the best player in the league.”

Posted by: Andrew Thell on February 26th, 2008 at 11:14 pm

Chris knows how to write.

Posted by: sunsfan on February 26th, 2008 at 11:14 pm

to all those steve nash haters out there f-u.steve nash never gets any respect. he is no dought the best point guard in the game. He makes his team better when hes off the floor his team falls. when dirk nowitski comes off the floor his team is fine without him! DIRK SUCKS! he never should have been MVP.its unbelieveable to me how much people critisize steve nash for his defense. no one is perfect my god! he at least has a respectable defense. steve nash is not even close to being overated.nash has proved time and time again that he can get it doen when it really matters. I promise u that the Phoenix Suns will win the championship this year and by the way DIRK SUCKS! i am the number 1 suns fan.and also spurs duncan sucks.boston is good but not as good as the suns. just to say again nash is the best in the game and the suns WILL WIN the Chamionship.oh and by the way dirk SUCKS!!!!!!!

Posted by: josh glasco on February 26th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

Josh Glasco should publish his post.

Posted by: sunsfan on February 26th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

Yeah most of the comments here doesnt agree with the writer? Do u play basketball Mr. “writer” of i you does maybe u sucks

Posted by: Paul on February 26th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

my josh your dirk hating machine

Posted by: nick on February 26th, 2008 at 11:31 pm

Nash does get respect, just too much. He is no doubt a great player, but he is over-rated because he has had one of the best teams around him. He gets most of the credit when they win games, but when they lose games he just about never gets blamed. Beside, you need a good team D to win in the postseason, and you can’t have one hole in your D. Since the 02-03 Spurs, the teams that won the Finals had decent D from their PGs(except Miami.Have no idea how they won). And BTW, the Suns can’t beat LA w/o Marion.

Posted by: ??? on February 26th, 2008 at 11:40 pm

First of all, even though I did chime in on the debate, it’s not supposed to be arguing over Nash’s MVP awards.

Second of all, Suns fans are so defensive. I guess 40 years of never winning a title will do that.

And there’s so much revisionist history going on here. The Suns were not as awful as the 29-win season would suggest. They had made the playoffs Amare’s rookie season, losing to Spurs in 6 games. The following year they suffered injuries to Marbury, and Amare only played 55 games. The year before with Marbury, Marion and Amare — that core won 46 games.

Nash’s arrival coincided with Amare’s return, and a roster full of role players that D’antoni had finally put together. They won 62 games. Indeed impressive, but it’s not as terrific a turnaround as we’re being made to believe here.

Posted by: JR on February 26th, 2008 at 11:40 pm

Every year you can make a case for 4 or 5 guys who deserve the MVP award but only one guy can win it, but to say Nash wasn’t deserving is dumb. You all bring up the point of Nash not being able to guard other point guards but no one talks about how they can’t guard him either. Look at the Spurs who use Bowen on him. When teams put their best defenders on you and draw up stratigies to stop you, your definately worth of MVP consideration. Look at tonights game Conely had 15 and 11 and shot 47%FG 0%3FG 100%FT. A career high in 11 assists but lost the game to Nash’s team with Nash having 25 and 13 while shooting 73%FG 60%3FG and 100%FT.

Posted by: Drew on February 26th, 2008 at 11:44 pm

OMG Josh. You must say everything that isn’t Nash sucks. Yeah, Dirk didn’t deserve MVP, but neither did Nash(That year and year before). Btw, Duncan happens to be one of the best PFs in the history of the game.

BTW, Lebron deserves MVP this year.

Posted by: Marcus on February 26th, 2008 at 11:44 pm

“[Dallas} also made it to the NBA Finals in 2006, something they never did before Nash left as a free agent. The Suns haven’t made it there with Nash either. ”

The Suns haven’t, true, but neither have 26 other teams since the 2005 NBA Finals, these teams include the Lakers, Nuggets, Sixers, Jazz, Rockets, Celtics, etc., I don’t think I need to go on.

I’m not hating on your article, I’m just giving factual rebutalls.

Posted by: Joseph on February 26th, 2008 at 11:47 pm

Your facts on the Suns are clearly not well researched. I would expect more of someone who, I would hope, has a background in writing. I understand your argument on Nash’s defensive skills, but you are completely disregarding why he’s won 2 MVPs and continues to be a contender - he was right behind Dirk last year - and is in the top 5 as of today. I mean, did you wear your Kobe jersey when you wrote this? Because it’s very obvious you are no fan of Steve Nash, but then again he doensn’t need an incompetent fan like yourself.

Posted by: J on February 26th, 2008 at 11:59 pm

Nash is great.. but Kobe is better.

No questions about it!

Kobe didn’t deserve an MVP ‘cuz his team was so poor.

He does deserve it this season.

Posted by: R on February 27th, 2008 at 12:01 am

i agree with you “R” im a steve nash fan Nash is Great but kobe is better.. and this season deserves the mvp for Kobe or Lebron

Posted by: Paul on February 27th, 2008 at 12:09 am

When you think about an MVP, you know if you’d made a mistake after giving it to him. I think people would agree Steve Nash deserved them when you look back at those two astonishing seasons. But how did you feel after Dirk accepted the award?
Nash could have put in three in a row and no one would have questioned it.

Posted by: ajboss on February 27th, 2008 at 12:20 am

Steve Nash is a big defensive liability for the Suns. But a successful defense involves the entire team and in this category the Suns are atrocious. And it really falls to D’Antoni for not emphasizing the importance of defense.

I have been a lifelong, diehard Suns fan, and I am still waiting for the ownership and coaching to figure this out. I love the offenses they have produced over the years and think it has done wonders for the NBA’s image makeover, but they must incorporate the same energy into the defensive end.

In the regular season of low stakes basketball the tempo can be dictated by offensive oriented, fast break basketball. The referees are tight on fouls, and so a good offense can win on pretty much any night. But playoff basketball is a grind out, physical affair where officials lower the standards for what is acceptable. And in high stakes ball the stress and mental exhaustion (which is usually the difference between winners and losers) will get to a team that has to score long before it will affect a team that has to stop the scoring.

Will Phx ever do it with Nash? Will D’Antoni read my comments? This team could play D if it were emphasized. They have the athleticism.

To say Nash is overrated or undeserving is just plain wrong. I was surprised by the re-peat, but he was as deserving as any other. The man is an offensive wizard. His big flaw is defense, but here D’Antoni and the coaching is to blame for the team’s weakness. The one on one comparison’s are baseless as Nash doesn’t guard scorers. A good defensive team can successfully make matchup adjustments.

Posted by: yo on February 27th, 2008 at 12:39 am

Let me remind you all that MVP stands for “most valuble player”, not best defender. They already have an award for that. The fact of the matter is that in the two years nash won his MVP’s, he was the most valuble player to his team. The sun’s wouldn’t have even been close to the caliber of team they are now if steve didn’t come there. Also, there is a stat that is most used in hockey games but is now being used in the nba. That stat is the +/-. Steve nash is ranked 3rd in that category for all players, and is first in point gaurds. that means that his team does a lot better when he is in vs when he is not. Finnally, there are 30 teams in the NBA. only 16 of those teams make the playoffs, 8 in each conference. steve nash has led his team to the playoffs in 9 of his 11 complete seasons in the nba. And he led the suns to the playoffs each of his 3 years there.

Posted by: Dave on February 27th, 2008 at 12:49 am

UM….so you Suns poeple that think you will be getting a championship this year…take note that out of all the teams with winning records in the west, Phoenix has the worst record vs. western conference teams. Championship material…I think not.

Posted by: mike on February 27th, 2008 at 1:01 am

**Posted by: yo on February 27th, 2008 at 12:39 am**

*yo*, thank u for a very interesting point of view…
at least someone understands Phx basketball…

here’s another example:

*Gay led the Grizzlies with a career-high 36 points. * (game today, 2/27/2008, Phx-Mem 127-113).

Gay scored at will. Luckily, Nash is not guarding Gay. Else, this moron writer, will put blame on Nash.

Problem with Phx is that they do NOT play team defense. They are really good on Regular Season but is still questionable comes Playoff.

It would be nice if they could really prove that offense (x2) could bring them to the Finals. (But I still had alot of doubt on it)

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 27th, 2008 at 1:05 am

My God people! Nash leads the league in assists every year, hit’s 90% on his freethrows, 40% on 3 pointers and 50% on anything else he throws up, and he throws up some shots that would make Pistol Pete proud. The additional fact that in 2003 the Suns won less than 30 games and they doubled that his first season there! They have hovered around the 60 games ever since, and had it not been for a cheap shot by Horry and bad decision by the Commish to bench to key players, they could very well have won the Championship last year. And one more thing for all you knuckleheads out there who can’t see this, the MVP is chosen before the end of the season for a reason. It would be too easy to pick who the MVP would be after a Champion has already been crowned. So any of you Nash haters who can’t understand how a guy that is white, can’t jump, is ugly as sin, but can outshoot, outhandle and run circles around 95% of the league, makes his team incredibly better can win the MVP two years in a row (could’ve been three) needs to not talk basketball like they know basketball. Cause you don’t.

Posted by: Anonymous on February 27th, 2008 at 1:06 am

**Posted by: Dave on February 27th, 2008 at 12:49 am**

very very very true…

Posted by: GhiaElcid on February 27th, 2008 at 1:08 am

The only “places” Steve Nash is overrated is in Phoenix and with the voters of the MVP award.

The players and non-hometown fans know just how good he is, and rate him accordingly.

Same goes for Dirk Nowitzki.

I’m not sure what the MVP is supposed to represent, but you would think that Nowitzki and Nash TOGETHER (who were both young, but not rooks, and healthy on the Mavericks team) would have at least made it to the Finals once if they were so good. I’m not even saying that combining MVPs means you should win a title (an expirement that had been tried many times with aging former MVPs), I’m just saying that two past or future MVPs with their youth and health and some years together should at least make the finals once.

Posted by: Allen on February 27th, 2008 at 1:47 am

Dont joke with me,

Steve Nash is pro

Posted by: Sam on February 27th, 2008 at 1:50 am

how did this writter even get to write this article on here, he’s just a Coby fan, and a nash hater, he probably didnt even finish highschool

Posted by: joe on February 27th, 2008 at 1:53 am

I wouldn’t call him overrated, a mvp is one who has the most impact on a team. The examples of Garnett and Bryant, they didn’t do such thing to their team, although being a huge lakers fan i hate to say this, but Nash did do a better job in improving their teammates, remember though Nash got all-star level players as teammates, how were the Suns doing before he came along? No one even considered the Suns competing for a playoff seat. About his defense, you’re dann right about it. He simply cannot defend. Not because he’s too weak but just that points in NBA are too strong, especially in the west, plus you now add Kidd to the conference, there really isn’t much room left to talk about defensive skills and liability. He is not overrated for being an MVP, but i’ll have to say from the MVP vote count for Kobe for past two seasons he was definitely underrated. Kobe is arguably the best defensive player in 2 position if he wants to, but for Nash he’s probably one of the worst in points you can ever find., and the thing is he’s trying, but he’s just not strong enough. That probably has to do with he grew up in canada. Americans (especially african-americans) are just way too frikin strong, got all that from the super heavy weight training and stuff like that, where as we don’t really do that much here in Canada. He deserves the MVP, for sure, what about two consecutive ones? maybe, great offensive player, yes, defense…. huh? where’s his defense???

Posted by: Eugene on February 27th, 2008 at 1:57 am

I think he is actually under-rated. He is not Michael Cooper or Joe Dumars, but he does still play good intelligent help D, and takes a lot of charges. On top of that he makes any team he is in play to the best of their ability and beyond it.

I just got back from watching him tonight in Memphis. It was just cruel the way he teased his opponents. He tried and tried to get his team-mates going without interfering…then every time things got bad, he took complete control and surged them forward. Under-rated

Posted by: Isiah on February 27th, 2008 at 2:09 am

well thats preety amazing how stupid you are sir. i really have no idea what to say u are an complete idiot. those numbers you talked about being an all star line… is made by all stars. so im not quite sure what your teying to rip on him for. he may not be the best defender he certainly isn’t the worst. and STAT is six in blocks in the nba so ya. stop being an idiot and maybe people wont write angry comments

Posted by: christien on February 27th, 2008 at 2:11 am

no disrespect to nash…
i like him though… but nash.??..MVP???

nah..i dont think so..

i think kobe was robbed for the past two seasons..
and no doubt this season he deserves to be the top candidate for MVP…

Posted by: rivers on February 27th, 2008 at 2:11 am

Seriously, what were you thinking while writing this article. If you are on the voting panel for the MVP award, they should strip you of those voting rights because you can’t understand the simple difference between regular season and post season. So, you a kobe fan or lebron fan ? that makes you such a big nash hater ? you might want to revisit the facts about the exact times that nash was on court and what were the opposing team statistics during that time, but you don’t have access to that kind of database, now do ya ?

Posted by: Ken S. on February 27th, 2008 at 2:11 am

MVP means Most Valuable Player, not Best Defensive Player… Get it? PHX’s 30 wins last 2003 is different from 50-60 wins in the last 4 years… Did you get it?

Posted by: Bata Ni Juan on February 27th, 2008 at 3:56 am

you are absolutely right steve nash sucks on D and defence is a thing tht a real mvp should have i have never seen steve nash play real defence

he stinks

Posted by: ALdsTaR on February 27th, 2008 at 4:11 am

i love the sun and steve nash, but nash is one of the worst defender in the NBA

Posted by: bob on February 27th, 2008 at 4:12 am

oh yeah an anonymous 2 places above mine comment :

very great all the stats you write but where re the defensive stats? a real mvp, two time mvp, could’ve been 3 time mvp should have great D but steve nash doesn’t so he shouldn’t have been mvp

Posted by: ALdsTaR on February 27th, 2008 at 4:15 am

you have good points andrew but your obvious bitterness at kobe not having an MVP obstructs your argument- this can be considered ‘bias’ and it detracts from convincing anyone not already in agreement with you
one thing you didnt take into account is the fact D is a team thing- suns dont play it well even even steve is off the floor (raja etc. often take PGs anyway so those stats are somewhat inaccurate)
IF they want to play better D they are going to have to pick it up AS A TEAM. therefore it is not steve alone who is holding them back there. One more reason- D’Antoni’s gameplan is intentionally 90% offense 10% defense- its not just the players.

on other people debating his MVPs
previous MVPs are irrelevant whether they play D or not- different years have different candidates since when do MVPs account for the postseason?
Most people agree that he deserved the first and theres enough evidence for that. the second year was without stoudamire and they did almost as well (against expectations).

Pistons and Celtics dominate the East for the moment and any number of teams in the west are threats but for me the Suns arent out of the picture- who knows if their all out offense will be enough this year? you cant say that steve is holding them back from a title- what were your stats 4-12 without him? they have as much chance as anyone at this point in time.

to JR: kobe had to do more than be a media ‘darling’ to get MVP over nash 2 years ago- their record wasnt good enough period (This year it could well be a different story) Still, what does that have to do with nash being overrated?

Posted by: thinkagain on February 27th, 2008 at 4:27 am

Andrew,

I don’t believe the hype.

I like the article. It’s cute that someone calls it a cop-out when you’re challenging a popularly assumed belief and doing so in a thoughtful, reasoned manner. Isn’t that sort of the opposite of a cop out? It’s not lazy or simplistic at all.

I’ve had issues with Nash even though I see a lot to appreciate. I think it’s interesting that some people in their responses don’t realize that Malone was a fantastic defensive player (only reason Lakers got past the Spurs in 03-04 was Malone’s great D on Timmy), especially later in his career, or that people don’t respect Bowen’s defense and just call him a hack. Some very strange ideas. Bowen’s been a top 5 perimeter defender for like a decade. He’s only slowed in recent years due to age. And he’s been a top vote getter for defensive player of the year for nearly a decade as well. The idea that he’s a strong two way player overall is pretty laughable though. His offense is painfully one-dimensional. He doesn’t even come up in a discussion of the best 20 two-way players in the league.

I think there are additional reasons Nash might be over-rated that you didn’t bring up.

Nash is over-rated, or at least not conscientiously rated when people don’t consider the impact of his coach. His coach runs a system designed specifically to take advantage of Nash’s strengths so it makes him look better than he otherwise would. This system also makes players around him look better as they get more activity and shot attempts. Because many players did not get as much PT on other teams, they are more likely to have their highest career averages with the Suns, and they have.

Suns lovers need to stop saying “if only” with the Horry cheap shot on Nash. You don’t know what would have happened. For a team to lack the mental fortitude and discipline to stay on the bench is an indictment of the team as a whole and the playoff maturity of their players. It only feels like the best chance because you got unlucky in one area. And because it feels like the best chance you assume that the Suns would have won it all when you really don’t know. The strong precedent of playoff teams needing great defense and playing great in the half court to win a championship has held pretty well. I believe the Suns have consistently underutilized Amare the last few years and not built a team to play good D and in half court sets during the regular season and that’s why they’ve failed. You certainly can’t disprove that idea as they haven’t succeeded.

Nash is a sweet player and the Suns can fairly be called the Funs because in Nash’s first season on the Suns they were extremely fun to watch and showed that you can be very successful in the regular season running. The Warriors have been another good example of a strong running team and I think they were a better running team than the Suns last year and this year (they did beat the Suns a few times moving at a faster pace than the Suns). One major difference between the Suns and the Warriors is, incidentally, a point guard that plays strong defense.

Nash is an excellent shooter and particularly efficient at it (most efficient in the league). I don’t think he can take the more difficult shots that other shooters like Ray Allen and Michael Redd can take. That of course could be partly an indictment of the other shooters, but having flexibility as a player means you can take what