- The Season's Over -

The NBA’s Great Gambling Gaffe

July 23, 2007

The Donaghy Family

Because of the organized crime slant, I fully intended to write this piece in the parlance of 1920s newsies. I even re-watched The Hudsucker Proxy to get a better feel for the lexicon. Well, about a half an hour in I realized how incredibly difficult that would be, and how woefully underqualified I was for such an endeavor. I did manage to get some nice old school gangster images though, so enjoy those. Feel free to read the rest of this with the rapid-fire, syncopated internal voice of a Prohibition Era newsie if you like.

By now we all know the the basics. NBA referee Tim Donaghy has been officially charged with using his whistle to ‘fix’ professional basketball games after wiretaps used to monitor the Gambino mobster case revealed his name. The investigation has been spearheaded by none other than the FBI and involves tens of thousands of dollars riding on multiple games Donaghy worked, both in the regular season and the postseason. Though the NBA has not made any specific comments on the case yet, as of now there is no reason to believe that the actual outcome of games were altered. In all likelihood the point totals of teams and statistics of specific players were manipulated in the interest of organized crime (As an obsessive fantasy basketball player, that hits pretty close to home).

No other officials have been implicated yet, but (pure) speculation about the potential breadth of the case is starting to swirl. While corruption and point-shaving scandals have been uncovered or at least suggested in the NFL, MLB, NCAA and 1978 FIFA World Cup, this is the first time something like this has been uncovered in the NBA. No matter the outcome, it is a major black eye for the league, the worst since the cocaine issues of the late 70s and early 80s.

Tim Donaghy is not a household name among NBA refs but he did get significant attention after the The Malice at the Palace when the Indiana Pacers and Detroit Pistons altercation spilled over into the crowd. At the time criticism was leveled at the officiating crew for allowing the melee to escalate to such a level, criticism which has been renewed and intensified in the last 48 hours (“The feeling among many referees was that Garretson and Donaghy, the two senior referees, could have been much more assertive in calming things down before the incident hit its flash point when a fan threw a cup of ice at Artest as he lay prone on the scorer’s table”).

Donaghy is also notable for handing out the most technical fouls among all referees last season. That’s relevant because perhaps the most specific revelation comes from The New York Daily News which has reported he was on the crew for a Knicks/Heat game that awarded the Knicks 39 free throws and only 8 for Miami, whistled technicals on Miami coach Pat Riley and assistant coach Ron Rothstein and called the Heat for three defensive 3-second violations (resulting in two technicals). The Daily News also mentions, citing an anonymous source, that the NBA may have actually had a PI following Donaghy for over a year- and yet continued to give him high-profile games.


The most significant game thought to be affected so far is Game 3 of the Spurs/Suns series during the 2007 playoffs, a game that was already very controversial and heavily scrutinized. ESPN’s Bill Simmons wrote this afternoon, “Before the Donaghy scandal broke, if you told me there was a compromised official working a 2007 playoff game and made me guess the game, I would have selected Game 3 of the Spurs-Suns series. There were some jaw-dropping calls throughout, specifically, the aforementioned Ginobili call and Bowen hacking Nash on a no-call drive that ABC replayed from its basket camera (leading to a technical from D’Antoni). Both times, Mike Breen felt obligated to break the unwritten code that play-by-play announcers — don’t challenge calls and openly questioned what had happened. The whole game was strange. Something seemed off about it.” This game occurred in the series which was most notable for the contentious suspensions of Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw after they left the bench to aid an injured Steve Nash. Suns fans can’t be happy right now.

“I’m telling you — it would have to be the total, not the winners or losers. You can’t dictate a side, especially in the NBA. He couldn’t take that chance. If someone gets injured or doesn’t show up or is having a terrible night or whatever, you can’t do it. But manipulating the total you can control from the very tip. If you need an over, a referee can dictate a high- or low-scoring game just by how he’s calling it. It’s going to come out [ . . . ]

Listen, this is just the first guy to get caught. I think, without question, there are more officials out there who have shaved points. I guarantee you there are. This is just the first guy to get caught.”
-Brandon Lang

In an interesting twist, perhaps the oft maligned Rasheed Wallace actually proved prescient in this whole affair. The subject of Donaghy’s wrath more than once over the years, did the reactionary star smell a rat? According to ESPN.com’s Chris Sheridan, “Donaghy also was involved in another controversy a few years back when he engaged in a shouting match with Rasheed Wallace on the loading dock of The Rose Garden in Portland, an incident that led to a seven-game suspension for Wallace, who was then with the Portland Trail Blazers. Donaghy and the two other referees who had worked that game passed by Wallace as they walked to their cars, and Wallace was said to have threatened Donaghy, who had assessed him a technical foul earlier that night during a Grizzlies-Blazers game.” Knowing the temperament of Wallace it was pretty easy to assume his outburst was just ‘Sheed being ‘Sheed. Perhaps recent events shed new light on that incident. Think about this: if a ref did intend to make unfounded foul calls, to take a player out of a game, to shave points off of a team’s or player’s total, who would be the easiest target? And who wouldn’t be afraid to make a scene about it?

Tim DonaghyI noticed something else interesting this afternoon. At the end of his blog post, Chris Sheridan casually lobs a hand grenade at several NBA officials saying, “Donaghy, a baby-faced 40, is one of four NBA referees to have graduated from Cardinal O’Hara high school in Philadelphia. The others are Joey Crawford, Mike Callahan and Ed Malloy.” Is it just me, or is this meant to implicate the other officials mentioned by tacitly suggesting that Donaghy’s ties with organized crime can be traced to his early days in Philadelphia, a city known for its influential crime families.

I find the inclusion of Joey Crawford especially interesting. One of ETB’s least-favorite officials, he’s also one of the most controversial refs in the NBA today. Crawford is known for making bizarre calls, interjecting his personality into the game and flexing his whistle in unusual ways- all of which often leads to direct and significant impact on games he works. After being suspended for the remainder of the season after the Tim Duncan fiasco, is more disciplinary action waiting in the wings for Joey?

On a personal level, very little will change for me as an NBA fan. Bill Simmons said it well, “If you’re a diehard NBA fan, you’re horrified but strangely hopeful, because we needed a tipping point to change a stagnant league that was headed in the wrong direction … and maybe this was it.” I love the NBA, but I must admit that I find the reffing consistently poor. To be fair, I think it’s far and away the most difficult sport to call. In a structured game like football or baseball there is a finite number of decisions that officials have to make. In a game like basketball that is completely fluid and dynamic, there is a near-infinite volume of potential calls and non-calls made each game. Still, nobody who watches the sport consistently can deny the frequent phantom calls, the inconsistency, that star treatment exists and that there is a consistent ‘home court advantage’ due to more than just home cookin’. Those flaws are always amplified in and magnified by the playoffs (particularly star treatment and home-court advantage), driving away a significant base of casual fans. I consider myself one of the diehard fans; if this scandal leads to more rigorous evaluation of and accountability for referee performance, improved training for officials and more effective preventative measures for malfeasance I will consider it a good thing. After the airplane ticket debacle and this, perhaps it would be a good idea to pay these guys a little more too.

When it gets down to it though, what serious NBA fan doesn’t know about the deficiencies of the officiating system? We’ve all noticed them, and we’ve all chosen to accept them as a beauty mark on our sport. For me the officiating is always going to be a 500 lbs. gorilla in the corner, but the spectacle and purity of the game transcends. If you love basketball, you’ve gotten over it and engage in your fandom accepting it. That isn’t to gloss over or condone conscious attacks on the integrity of the competition. Any intentional effort to undermine that integrity must be met with the swiftest of action and the harshest of punishment. We should also never accept an officiating product from the NBA that is less than their means allow them to provide. We should demand skilled, trained, capable and unbiased referees in every game. But as far as just plain bad calls go: they will always be a part of NBA Basketball. If we can’t deal with that fact, we deny ourselves the enjoyment of America’s greatest sport.

I’m going to watch just as many games. I’m going to root just as hard. I’m going to be just as tough on the refs, and I’m probably going to enjoy it all just the same. It’s going to be a little more work, as a fan, to keep track of specific ref’s tendencies. I’m going to have to expand my knowledge of poor officials beyond Bennett Salvatore, Joey Crawford, Dick Bavetta, Violet Palmer and Ed Rush. You know what the worst thing is going to be though? Watching a game with a buddy who’s team is losing. Any game . . . for the next decade.

UPDATE ON JOEY CRAWFORD: According to The Denver Post, “Referee Joey Crawford, suspended in April, is scheduled to meet with Stern on Friday in New York, according to an NBA source. It will be the first meeting between Stern and Crawford since the suspension, which came after the referee ejected San Antonio Spurs star Tim Duncan for laughing while the player was on the bench and asked the forward if he wanted to fight.” Interesting. Very interesting.

And there’s this delicious little nugget from ESPN.com today: ” . . . Donaghy also is said to have exchanged blows with fellow Philadelphia native Joey Crawford at a refs’ meeting years ago.” I wonder what that could have been about . . .

You can skip the obnoxious intro, but the following video does show some nice highlights from that now-infamous Game 3:

10 Comments »Posted by Andrew Thell on Jul. 23, 2007 at 10:25 pm in ETB Articles, NBA

10 Responses

Kudos, a pretty good summary of what happened and how it’s going to affect us fans. To be honest it’s more embarassing than anything, because I think anybody who watches enough knows the foibles of NBA refereeing and decides to love the sport anyways. One thing though: So you really think Chris Sheridan was calling out Joey Crawford et al?

Posted by: Sonny Liston on July 24th, 2007 at 9:14 pm

GREAT ARTICLE! Best article I have seen in any forum.

I think David Stern knew more than he is letting on, and he knew it well before this story broke. (Perhaps Joey Crawford was more than just a hothead when he was suspended.) If Stern knew Donaghy was (even) possibly shaving points and let him keep working, including the Spurs and Suns series, then Stern will have a lot of explaining to do.

Posted by: gurf morlix on July 25th, 2007 at 1:45 am

Great post, though I disagree with you. I don’t think Joey Crawford or any other referee was involved. I don’t think that Game 3 was fixed, and, aside from the Ginobili late whistle, none of the calls in that video are even directly attributable to Donaghy.

And I don’t think it’ll change how I watch the game. I’ll get upset when a bad call goes against my team. Am I then going to assume that it’s because the ref is shaving points or something? No. If I did so, then I might as well stop watching the NBA….

Posted by: stopmikelupica on July 25th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

The conspiracy theorist in me wonders one thing. I have long suspected that Stern mandated his referees to “sway” games toward teams to set up favorable playoff matchups. Especially as a Pacers fan during the 90′s. When the Feds put the screws to Donaghy. What are the chances that he protects Stern? Does that have something to do with the swift condemnation of Donaghy from Stern? This could be interesting.

Posted by: aaron babb on July 25th, 2007 at 2:13 pm

[...] NBA’s Gambling Gaffe [Empty Bench]: A lengthy, but well thought out discussion of the NBA’s newest scandal. Will we be able to [...]

Posted by: Blog Roundup for 7-25-07 >> Sportable, Where Sports are a Lifestyle on July 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm

[...] Here’s what former Las Vegas Councilman and current gadfly Steve Miller has to say about the NBA’s Tim Donaghy problem: According to INSIDE VEGAS contributor and former Chicago Crime Commission member John J. Flood, [...]

Posted by: William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » NBA using referee betting scandal as “bogus reason” to stay out of mobbed-up Las Vegas on July 25th, 2007 at 3:27 pm

Mr. Liston: I just added an addendum to the Joey Crawford speculation based on a couple of juicy nuggets I read today. I have no idea if Crawford was involved in any wrongdoing, maybe it’s just wishful thinking on my part, but the coincidences are starting to pile up.

By the way, Mark Knopfler led me to believe you had passed on some time ago. Glad to hear that wasn’t the case.

Posted by: Andrew on July 25th, 2007 at 3:34 pm

aaron babb: Great point. I had read speculation that it was someone with mafia ties who actually spilled the beans on Donaghy, and that it was a major mistake becuase now the hot-headed ref is going to cooperate with the Feds against them.

You put another spin on it though: With Stern so quick to distance himself from Donaghy, does this mean that he’ll turn on the NBA and reveal any dirty secrets Stern might have? Obviously not related to gambling, but on potentially influencing playoff matchups, extending playoff series, treatment of ‘star’ players, promoting home-court advantage, etc? Very interesting.

Posted by: Andrew on July 25th, 2007 at 3:39 pm

I like the stuff you said in the article, but I would like to have seen some sources other than Chris Sheridan and Bill Simmons — both ESPN writers. ESPN is the evil-empire and there are other writers who had some good insight into specific games that Donaghy worked.

Other than that, noble effort.

Posted by: Geoff on July 25th, 2007 at 5:32 pm

I wonder if my bookie will refund me my money.

Posted by: Will aka the degenerate gambler on July 25th, 2007 at 7:26 pm

Leave a Comment

(will not be displayed)